The Wealth of Social Innovation

LaurenA's picture
With the proliferation of social innovation around the world, there has grown a somewhat awkward tension in relation to where social innovation sits on the commercial spectrum between profit and nonprofit. Indeed, the word entrepreneur conjures up an impression of someone who has made profit from a new business concept or product. So what happens when the word is applied in relation to the social sphere, where ideas are measured by their contribution to society rather than their value as a money-spinner? Is there a belief that these innovations should not make money at all? To the contrary, it is becoming more and more evident that the success of the social innovation sector will be measured holistically, with both social and financial performance targets being crucial to the overall sustainability and viability of a social enterprise. Take the example of Call Britannia in London - a commercial call centre operation established to help bring out-of-work people back into employment, while actively encouraging them to seek employment elsewhere. While this organisation has a social mission at its foundation and leverages this in seeking partnerships, it has found a way to operate as a successful profit-making business to ensure its long-term viability and growth. And it is just one of the many pursuing this objective. In Australia, the environment for social innovation seems to be hindered by a suspicion of social businesses seeking to make a profit, and financial and taxation constraints on nonprofit social enterprises looking to become more viable. However, both here and around the world, the case to explore this hybrid is growing stronger all the time. As suggested in a recent article in Canada's Financial Post, this may be because of a growing trend of people wanting to invest philanthropically while they are still alive. In the same vein, people are wanting to see their contribution being leveraged as much as possible, rather than it being funneled through a nonprofit organisation in order to just keep it afloat. This is where the opportunity lies in social innovation, where funds invested into an idea have the opportunity to earn both a social and financial return. There is surely a place for profit-making social enterprises, just as there is for socially-responsible businesses. The question is how can we better shape our commercial, political and social environment to truly foster and support this growth and innovation? Only then will we be able to harness the wealth of the sector.

Comments

Humanise's picture

Re: The Wealth of Social Innovation

Related to the Wealth of Social Innovation is "What's in it for me". For many of us that answer lies with feeling good about ourselves and our families. In trying to start up a Humanitarian Open Source project called Humanise.org, I have looked at what advantages people taking part in the project could find from having helped with the project. This Humanise.org project is currently one of the contenders for the Social Innovation Camp. The project is to create an Open Source software oriented metal detector suitable for Humanitarian Demining and related research. Advantages that I came up with for this project were as follows: "Why you Should Help * That warm fuzzy feeling knowing that you are helping to save thousand of little children from getting killed or getting their limbs blown off. * Imagine how proud of you your parents/ grandparents/ children/ grandchildren will be knowing that you have helped with this project * It will look great on your resume. Could help you beat all the opposition in getting a great new job or promotion. * You will become particularly attractive to members of the opposite sex when they find out about the great work you have done on this project * By becoming involved now you come in at the beginning of the project. This allows you to be one of the grand master experts on the project. * This sort of work will make a great dinner/party conversation topic * You could become very rich from use of the final product. The final product will be useful for other things such as creating gold detectors. * As part of this project your design is done with a purpose. Due to this you will find that you end up learning far more and far easier than learning from study. * Allows you to prove that you are special. Allows you to show that you are a genius. * Participants are able to get a name@humanise.org email address. * The good feeling you get knowing that you have done something good with your life." You will find that above reasons on the side bar of the main page of the Humanise.org website. The above is the type of personal wealth that I hope people achieve in all the social innovation projects.
SteveL's picture

Re: The Wealth of Social Innovation

I watched Andrew Denton interview Mohammed Unis in his Elders program on ABC TV last night and he made a few useful comments on where profit maximisation worked in social change endeavours and some places where it doesn't. I think there is a useful place for organisations set up as non-profits, and also for profit making companies, to both play important roles. I think the profit maximising 'value free' business is fast becoming a form we can no longer afford as a global community. The challenge is how to convince greedy vocal shareholders that ethical behaviour is the sustainable path and not big short-term profits. While nonprofits can engage communities and build social capital and 'common wealth' assets, 'for profits' can more readily access investment capital for growth and scale. Nonprofits are often more willing to share IP but less effective at developing and exploiting it.
admin's picture

Re: The Wealth of Social Innovation

I also tend to believe that current government public policy making models are going to have a hard time trying to catch up with social innovator's models and support them. In that way, the role of society becomes increasingly important when deciding what type of organisations and models they support. My feeling is that people in general are becoming less accepting of dealing with organisations that are not socially aware and are also becoming more supporting of organisations and models that include a social benefit component in their working methods. I would see a future (or at least I hope to see it) where new ventures do not have to make a decision on whether it makes sense to include socially innovative solutions in their enterprises but that it will not be possible to start a new venture unless you take that into account. At that point I think Governments could play a more important role in their policy making process.
LaurenA's picture

Re: The Wealth of Social Innovation

I completely agree with your perspective on the hangover of ideological discomfort in regards to making money in a social context. And also the fact that the entrepreneurial spirit by nature is determined to overcome challenges and constraints through innovative thinking. But is there any role for government/society to play in improving the environment to support this kind of thinking? Or does innovative thinking in fact flourish more in response to a limited environment that demands an unorthodox approach to solving problems?
msweeks's picture

Re: The Wealth of Social Innovation

Partly - innovation is often spurred by contraints and apparent obstacles. Necessity being the mother of invention, and all that. But that is not an argument for government or indeed for other large organisations (the 'trees' in Geoff Mulgan's conceptualisation) to act in ways that are deliberately obfuscating or resistant. To me, the big issue for government - and more generally for public policy - is to become both more attuned and more open to the rhythm of social innovation, if you like. Social innovators have a way of thinking and acting and tend to have insights that the large, often slow and cumbersome processes of public policy find hard to accommodate. Changing that situation to the point where the policy process is more capable and willing to pick up the social innovator's energy and insights and work with them is a key priority for both policy makers and innovators.
msweeks's picture

Re: The Wealth of Social Innovation

I'm not sure making money has anything to do with it. That is more likely to be a leftover of am old ideological discomfort with people making money while they are doing good. To me, the big issue is the application of the core attributes of the entrepreneur to social change and social problem solving - the capacity to see opportuntiy where others see problems, the ability to see what's possible when others tend to see why it can't be done and, critically, the willingness to think of possible without any reference to either what has been done before or what orthodox thinking might dictate. Innovators tend to be obsessed by the result. Most of the rest doesn't really matter.